Incoming U.S. President Donald Trump’s promise to impose steep energy tariffs, even if he can no longer guarantee prices won’t rise, defined much of his 2024 presidential campaign and political life. Going back to the 1980s, Trump has championed protectionism as an economic and political tool, threatening to stymie or enable capital mobility to shape international relations and domestic economic policy.
In the energy space, Trump has paired this with “Drill Baby Drill.” The argument is that if America produces more energy, higher supplies will lead to cheaper energy, making American exports, energy or otherwise, more globally competitive, and economic gains would offset environmental degradation. This policy would also mitigate likely retaliatory tariffs from energy-exporting countries hurt by American tariffs.
America’s partners have almost uniformly expressed outrage and horror at the proposition. Meanwhile, China, the adversary to be compelled by American tariffs, has not reacted in the way Trump or his acolytes hope. Chinese oil producers and traders, solar panel manufacturers, light industry conglomerates, and countless others in or adjacent to the energy sector are optimistic about American tariffs. They consistently argue in Chinese media that America’s tariffs will ultimately isolate America from its allies, weaken American exports in third-party countries, and help China build up its domestic aggregate demand.
The underlying explanation for why any tariff is that it discourages domestic corporations from purchasing foreign inputs by enforcing tariffs, making domestic partners more competitive. These fees are paid through foreign purchases from any actor, not through foreign corporations, as many times falsely or in bad religion. affirm or believe.
Energy tariffs have added layers of complexity. They are sometimes placed on the line between the development of general economic plans and industrial policy. Since energy is an input to existing economic activity, any tariff has an immediate effect on the entire economy. This makes them sturdy but less accurate tools. Energy price charts can simply revive or ruin entire industries, curb unwanted foreign economic activity, and radically adjust environmental outcomes. This is done not only by applying rates, but also by setting up how rates are paid: fixed rates, usage over time, screen-based rates or time of day, etc. There are dozens of tactics to set this up.
In China’s economy, where, despite economic liberalization, the state still occupies the commanding heights of the economy, China’s National Development and Reform Commission sets prices at artificially low rates. NDRC guidelines are then carried out on the provincial level by local government and Chinese Communist Party officials. While this does make exports competitive, it also creates bureaucratic inefficiencies, a tremendous burden on public finances, and inhibits domestic consumer consumption. Past attempts at reform didn’t go well. In 2021, subsidies for manufacturers using domestic renewable energy were ended, and prices were liberalized. The resulting economic turmoil helped cause energy shortages and made the government to freeze further planned reforms, waiting three more years before unrolling the most timid of reforms at a glacial pace.
High tech exports are an increasingly vital part of China’s economy.
China’s rapid, export-driven progress has helped lift many millions of people out of extreme poverty. But it also creates an economic paradox for China if it needs to emerge from the ranks of middle-income countries. To export, China will have to keep its currency weak while keeping power and hard work prices low so its products remain competitive.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping took power in 2012, he tried to put force at the center of his policies. The flagship programmes that have marked his mandate highlight this preference and the limits of this strategy. China’s Belt and Road Initiative has worked to boost the infrastructure structure of force to reshape industry and mitigate excessive domestic spending while advancing foreign policy goals. But so far, the BRI has spent too much money and failed to replace the industry as much as it would like.
More successful has been the “Made in China 2025” plan, which emphasizes high-value, high-tech exports. China is now the world leader in many energy fields. China refines about 90% of the critical minerals used in green energy, exports a quarter of the world’s electric and electric vehicles, and has more solar panels for use and export than the rest of the world combined.
These export and manufacturing successes haven’t rescued China’s ailing economy or generated consumer spending to fight deflation. In fact, without American tariffs, China’s lavish subsidies would have likely been a bridge too far. Thankfully for Xi, American tariffs are unintentionally configured to help China.
At a basic level, Xi needs to escape the middle-income trap by forcing Chinese exports of goods for his customers to diversify and lose their primacy at the center of the Chinese economy, eventually ending up more in the hands of Chinese customers. . through domestic consumption, while exports in strategic high-value and high-tech sectors would occupy a central place. This was made transparent in the 13th and 14th Five Year Plans, which also stated that such a reform would be distressing.
Any pain that the CCP’s policies would have imposed upon the Chinese people can now be credibly laid at the feet of America. Furthermore, a general decrease in global capital mobility will further ease the pain for China. The sectors of the economy that the CCP does not prioritize will suffer, with little risk to macroeconomic ambitions. Without China making the first move, Chinese firms will be compelled by genuine market forces rather than often heavy-handed and inefficient state mandates to realize Xi’s vision.
In the immediate term, many inputs for American companies have no non-Chinese counterparts, meaning they will have to endure the costs and pass them on to consumers. In the medium term and long term, American tariffs will, by design, reduce Chinese exports to America and will likely increase American manufacturing capacity. However, it is unlikely that these gains would outweigh losses stemming from retaliatory tariffs and decreasing competitiveness in the global south.
These are valuable opportunities that could address valid considerations about China’s labor, environmental, and intellectual property rights policies, which have harmed countless Americans. Beyond party lines, energy industry experts will disagree on the precise solution to strengthen independence from American power and task growth. However, there are promising initiatives, such as the bipartisan carbon boundary adjustment mechanism. Whatever the optimal solution is, it’s probably not one that your opponent appreciates. The US energy price charts do not weigh on the long-suffering Chinese economy; they just give you the weight you would gain anyway.
A community. Many voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts.
Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.
To do this, please comply with the posting regulations in our site’s terms of use. Below we summarize some of those key regulations. In short, civilized.
Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:
User accounts will be locked if we become aware that users are engaging in:
So how can you be a user?
Thank you for reading our Community Standards. Read the full list of posting regulations discovered in our site’s Terms of Use.