More productive static site developers will create lightweight internet sites with ultra-short load times.
The best static site generators will help you build lightweight websites with ultra-short load times.Most modern websites are dynamic. When a visitor accesses a page, the site will typically query a database to fetch your content, then identify the templates it needs and render the page for the user. It’s a flexible approach, but it’s also slow, and requires a lot of web server resources.
A static site generator takes your website templates, your databases and content drawn from other sources, and it generates pages in advance. When a visitor accesses a page, there’s no need to access databases or make a pile of other backend queries: your site can display the required content in a flash.
The benefits of static site turbines are that they improve performance, give the developer a lot of flexibility, and produce sites that require minimal server resources.
The bad news is that static site developers are, for the most part, much more complicated to use than those like WordPress. There are few or no versions, what you need is to know how to work with your basic knowledge and then master a command. Line interface.
The most productive static site turbines can still be a great advantage for expert users who know how to use them and that’s why, in comparison, the most sensible competition in aspects such as ease of use, learning curve, documentation, variety of plugins and languages, and pricing, among others.
We’ve gathered eight of the best right here, so you’re sure to find the right product for your site. But if you’re looking for simpler, check out our picks of the best website builder services right here.
We have also indexed the blogging platform.
Hugo claims to be the fastest static generator on the web, and we can’t argue with the numbers: this product has a generation time of less than 1ms per page.
There’s a lot to love elsewhere, too. Hugo includes over three hundred themes, so you can find the best look for your site, and it also comes with templates that can take care of common site-building tasks, such as optimizing SEO, enabling comments, and adding analytics.
Hugo’s slick design pairs with impressive flexibility. This product supports unlimited content types, and it works in multiple languages. And if you want to get technical, you can use markdown syntax, shortcodes, and multiple output formats. You can also upload Hugo-built sites to any host.
Hugo is open-source, so it works on all major platforms and is absolutely free. Start here if you want a fast and intuitive builder and don’t want to spend any money.
Pelican is another free, open-source static site generator, and it uses the Python programming language and Jinja for templating and themes. That’s a great start: Python is popular, and Jinja has high-tech templates for virtually every situation.
Pelican enables users to create content in reStructuredText or Markdown, its static output can be hosted anywhere, and it can publish content in multiple languages. It supports Atom and RSS feeds, and it can also import content from WordPress, RSS feeds and other services – so you can use content from existing sources to generate new pages.
The modular plugin formula also allows for many additional features for your sites. This is a wonderful free option, but keep in mind that it’s only suitable if you’re already familiar with Python and have Python installed on your device.
Many static site turbines are intimidating if you don’t have technical expertise, but Eleventy tries to back up the trend with some simplicity.
Its simplicity doesn’t mean Eleventy lacks features. Amazingly, you can use and combine ten other template languages when creating this product, from HTML and Markdown to JavaScript and Moustache, and Eleventy also supports traditional registry extension managers and the ability to load plugins. in a serverless environment.
It’s a free product, too, so you’ve got no excuse to get going, especially if you want to build sites with multiple languages. Eleventy is impressively fast in the browser and during builds, and is highly configurable because it runs on JavaScript.
You’ll also find plenty of documentation and from an active network (GitHub and Discord) if you have any questions.
Gatsby isn’t just a static site generator – it’s a suite of tools that aims to take the pain out of all aspects of website creation. It can generate websites with content that’s pulled from your choice of CMS, database, API, or file system, with over 2,000 plugins supported.
Once your content is retrieved, you can embed the generation you need on your static sites, preview it on Gatsby’s cloud service, and load pages and sites on the server of your choice.
Gatsby has many advantages. Automated code splitting, symbol prefetching, and optimization speed up authoring, scale emails when needed, and off-the-shelf authoring is standard.
Gatsby’s free cloud product allows the user to create a traditional domain, but if you need to scale, you need to pay for its Professional or Enterprise products, which start at $42. 50 per month if you pay annually. With so many benefits, Gatsby runs smoothly.
Nikola gets to work quickly by importing content from several different formats, including Markdown, Python, HTML, and reStructedText, and it creates incremental builds of your sites – which saves time, bandwidth, and storage space.
You can host Nikola’s site on any provider, and there are plenty of other features that make this tool easier to use and more powerful. Its user interface revolves around easy commands, it includes automatic rebuilds, and it works with loads of CMS apps if you do not want to delve into coding and command-line interfaces.
Elsewhere, Nikola supports almost forty languages, it allows you to write your own plugins and use those in its extensive library. And, as an open-source product, it is free too.
Nikola has an IPython plugin that simplifies the creation of IPython content.
Jekyll is an undeniable and effective static generator that has been around since 2008 and is still one of the most popular free features on the market.
It uses a repetitive and command-based design that makes it undeniable to use, even for beginners on the command line. You can import content from WordPress, RSS, Google Reader, Joomla, and many other third-party providers.
Jekyll uses the Liquid templating language to implement many other themes and extras on their sites, and lately it’s being used by companies like Spotify, Twitch, and Netflix to create pages temporarily and efficiently, so you can be sure it will get the job done. for you too. Although there is no traditional code in the templates, they are simpler and come with the right wizards and filters.
Jekyll can generate JavaScript, CSS, and HTML files from CoffeeScript, Markdown, or Sass files.
Most static site developers take a very minimalist approach: they replace the CMS entirely with small but enigmatic command-line tools.
Publii does things differently. It’s a desktop application (for Windows, Mac, and Linux) that works like a CMS, with an easy-to-use interface, templates, themes, and plugins, and a drag-and-drop editor, but it generates static HTML when you publish your site. This makes this tool less difficult for those unfamiliar with command lines.
Publii also supports Google AMP and SEU needs with plugins and tutorials, and your pages can be hosted anywhere. It has one-click sync with Google Cloud, GitHub, AWS, and other cloud providers, and you can still dig into the code if you prefer to thank the Block and Markdown editors.
Surprisingly, Publii is also free. It’s one of the most comprehensive static turbines on the market and is a great choice if you need a more familiar interface.
Statiq is a newer addition to the static generator market and is one of the few products that runs on Microsoft’s ArrayNET framework. So, it’s ideal if you’re familiar with this progression platform.
It’s easy to load content into Statiq Markdown web pages, and it’s just as easy to load metadata, resources, and scripts into your pages, as long as you’re familiar with the command line.
Statiq Web is flexible and also integrates with other products: Statiq Docs creates with a lot of documentation and Statiq’s Framework tool can create traditional static generation applications, so you can even create your own static page generator tool.
Make no mistake about it: Statiq Web and its partner products are high-end and powerful tools that require plenty of technical knowledge to use effectively. But if you do understand your way around .NET and the command line, you’ll be good to go.
We’ve also highlighted the most productive internet hosting and WordPress hosting on the market.
Static developers are the team of choice for content control systems (CMS) and generate static HTML websites by applying knowledge and content to templates.
HTML pages created through static developers are notorious for loading incredibly fast in browsers.
These are the most productive features you can have today. Each comes with a number of advantages and disadvantages. One of the most important things when it comes to opting for one over the other is your own technical skills.
If you are more knowledgeable than some, then you will definitely be disappointed in the less technical SSGs. If you are interested to learn, your best option is one with a medium level of technical difficulty paired with dependable documentation to guide you through the process.
You also deserve the speed you prefer for your website. It is natural for developers to opt for the fastest ones.
Another focus is on the programming language. You deserve to opt for the SSG that is written in the language in which you are most talented. Otherwise, you need to educate yourself about the language first, which can be time-consuming and you could lose energy or interest in building your site afterwards.
We test those static site turbines in many aspects related to their performance. We looked at the type of user they were most productive for, their learning curve, and the programming languages they offered.
We evaluated the number of themes they offered, the variety of useful tools, the quality of documentation, and the number of plugins they supported.
We also checked how many formats the tools would allow importing from and how intuitive the overall graphical interface was, among other aspects.
Mike has served as a generation journalist for over a decade and has written for most of the UK’s top tech headlines in many global media outlets. He loves PCs, laptops, and all new hardware, and covers everything from the latest business trends to the latest trends. -Final game equipment.
Best Agency Website Builders (2024)
How to choose a website template: 5 top tips
The self-confessed director claims that the team is “building considerate relationships” with its partners rather than romantic options.
TechRadar is from Future US Inc, a leading foreign media organization and virtual publisher. Visit our corporate site.