Japan is one of my favorite places for photography, so when I went there last month for the annual CP Camera Show, I had an idea about which camera to take. Since I’m racing to finalize our reviews of the Panasonic Lumix S5II and S5IIX. twins, this would be the best opportunity to get a little more firing time on the S5IIX. As a bonus, it allowed me to try Panasonic’s new 28-200 F4-7. 1 Macro OIS, a lens so small it’s just beggar. to be used for travel.
If there’s one theme that comes up in this gallery, it’s umbrellas. It’s one of the rainiest trips I’ve taken in years, and with the exception of a few days, I struggled to snap a picture of anything without an umbrella. the frame. While it’s not my particular mission, it’s a wonderful opportunity to test the waterproofness of the S5IIX. On several occasions, the camera was exposed to constant rain for several hours, dripping all the time. I’m pleased to report that he never missed a beat. Kudos to Panasonic for that.
This gallery includes street photographs of Tokyo and Yokohama, as well as photographs of snow monkeys at the Jigokudani Monkey Park near Nagano.
Want to see more pictures from the camera?Check out our gallery of original samples of the Lumix S5IIX.
Very good photos of the street, especially at night. I like the color reproduction of photos at night.
I must admit that pattern galleries can be boring, but this one was fun. Excellent job!
It’s a wonderful set of examples and it’s also fun to browse through the content alone, thank you so much!
Having been to Japan recently, I applaud your paintings even more. It’s a gallery.
Examples of gallery images I’ve seen here for a long time, beautiful photographs that show the functionality of the Lumix S5II.
Thank you. You enjoyed the photos!
Nowadays, almost all cameras work well in the right hands!:-) Japan is a very flattering country thanks to photography, here are some wonderful examples!
Will more gallery pictures be taken with some of the other lenses?The new 28-200mm is good, but probably not the sharpest lens in the range.
And will there be video examples, given that the S5II and S5IIx are hybrid cameras with a lot of video features?
Not in this gallery. I took a lens to Japan, and it’s 28-200mm. However, the gallery of moments I connected to at the back of the article includes photographs taken with the Panasonic 70-200mm F2. 8 and several premium Sigma lenses.
We’re running a video reel for review that shows examples of clips in the settings.
Thank you Dale!
What’s that white thing I see in the pictures of the mountains?It looks so fluffy. I see that where I live.
“I see that where I live. “
Unfortunately, many regions will register for you.
The cumulative electrical charge of these photographs is greater than the price of the camera.
I’m amazed that the East Asian cultural style still has functional eyes.
??I’m jealous ?I’d also like to take some in Japan for my tests. ?
I’m looking to create the backpack needed to bring your camera collection. ?
I’m curious: what device(s) would you take with you to Japan?Is there anything specific that stands out to you?
? In fact, I would be angry, this great challenge has never presented itself. Probably my Fujifilm X-T5 with 56mm, I love mini telephoto lenses. Unless. . . ! I’ve experienced overloads when I was young, never again ?
I look at this gallery and realize that photographs taken with my phone are much better effortlessly.
Of course, photographs can be edited to your liking in LR, but this requires additional effort and time.
Then, the factor of length and weight, such a camera smoothly weighs more than 1 kilogram with the kit lens. Who needs to carry so much with them all the time?
I would have been willing to pay for a small, sleek, big-sensor compact camera with a pancake lens, symbol stabilization, and computational photography inside. A point-and-shoot camera that creates stunning effects without the need to edit them on a PC to make them look good. A camera with a high-speed one-button NFC connection to the smartphone, which can be seamlessly and intuitively connected with cellular devices.
Well, instead of the former that doesn’t exist, I’m in favor of the most productive solution, a phone that does all of the above and has compatibility in my pocket.
The answer is NO, your phone can’t take pictures as smart as this camera.
@FordFairlane
Maybe your phone can’t?
@eno2: Define “best”, set the resolution, describe the target and target of the image, describe the optical quality.
I hope you know that JPEGs on phones are super primed and to some extent oversaturated to look smart and pleasing to the eye for most people without the need for additional modifications. Once you take care of those files, you’ll soon notice that they give way. in easily.
And speaking of colors, I have to say that this gallery looks elegant and I’m picky about colors. Panasonic knows how to combine them. But then again, anyone who has calibrated their personal flavor with a smartphone may be disappointed.
@couleurs Vivid
Set “the”, set “shall”, set “I”, set “define”.
@Alex: Definition: Yes
I’m waiting for the telephone that I can attach a 300mm f2. 8 or 600mm f4 lens to and put in my pocket. I’m expecting a telephone with a high-resolution viewfinder, a shutter speed of 1/8000, an f22 aperture that doesn’t look ugly and automatically eliminates the heads of the people in front of me at a concert.
@boldcolors “Defining ‘Best'”
Better DR, bigger tonal curve, bigger colors. A symbol that looks pleasing to the eye with no extra effort if desired.
And NO, no ILC camera is yet capable of delivering wonderful photographs directly from the camera. All ILCs have disorders with the exposure of faces, disorders with overexposure and underexposure in a scene (just take a look at the night photographs above, they are exposed above and below). on the udder and I can’t clearly see people’s faces, etc. All these disorders can be solved simply with computational photography, but camera brands are afraid, very afraid to implement this type of technique because they could not possibly justify so many models. in the diversity and difference between APS-C and FF will be irrelevant in maximum scenarios.
@mgm2 “Why do you bother visiting those sites?”
Because photography is my hobby and I still care. . . The challenge will remain when I and others like me no longer bother to discuss it on the web.
I love my Pixel 8, I shoot with it a lot, but compared to my cameras, it has a very, very narrow track where it sticks out. . . For fairly static scenes with the 25mm main camera module, the phone really achieves processing. More often than not, I’ve taken inspiration from the Pixels in this regard.
For action, UWA, TV, subject isolation or pretty much anything, I prefer my cameras (from the M4/3 to the FF and even the compact 1″ I rented), there’s no competition in those areas. Fake Bokeh Effects on Phones You still miss quite a bit and you just want to miss a part of the time so you don’t get trustworthy. The UWA, more often than not, is too wide and an afterthought with a smaller sensor.
(next)
Computer tricks also tend to fail when there’s too much movement in the scene and extra frames are simply thrown out the window (at least for the domain with motion), meaning the phone can temporarily go from an IQ that rivals the M4/3 or APS-C to the same IQ as a P
Both have value and camera brands can surely do more on the software front, but my phone may not be replacing my compromised cameras anytime soon.
MyrealityPhones tend to have very advanced solutions and very large viewers. Some even fold. F22 – I think it’s simple for them, almost natural. When it comes to shutter speed, they do quite well. 1/65536 I think the A7 may be the solution.
@Ephemeris: I think you’re talking about screens, not viewfinders. Even the most productive get into trouble under a bright light. F22- I wouldn’t look at closing effects or anything above a 13×19 inch print!/65536:Just a promotion point and almost dead even at f/1. 4 on the beach. Just take a look at the online photo comparisons between the effects of mobile phone cameras and everything else.
@Ma Reality
I’ll be preparing a huge one for my Sony A7III in the next few weeks, don’t worry.
My reality, don’t you mean screens? My R5’s viewfinder is just a small, low-profile screen. Your phone can have more than one at a time.
Shutter speed. You said the phone couldn’t. It can be opened. You said the phone couldn’t. Can
So 3 to remove from your list.
Um, the vast majority of phones don’t have any variable aperture, so I don’t know where this perception comes from, they shoot wide open at all times, at all times, because there’s no aperture and they’re already limited in diffraction and macro – besides, they have a pretty deep DoF (which they only modify thanks to PC tricks). . .
There’s also a big difference between employing an EVF and practicing: they’re absolutely protected from the sun and pressed against your face, which affects stability. I say this as someone who shoots a lot with their camera’s rear screen and loves their Pixel 8, but it’s still chalk and cheese.
Try the S9 plus, Huawei has made some, the Xiaomi from China, and me more. Lots and lots on the maps. So they gave it to me from the global of reality.
As for the electronic viewfinder pressed in front of your eye, what about Google’s cardboard?50 pence for two electronic viewfinders.
Maybe try to use camera elements that are better, individual, or niche, and not things that just don’t fit.
It’s like talking to other people on the Flat Earth. You laugh because they have to joke around, then you look at the palm when you realize they’re serious.
A phone doesn’t take any more pictures. But you don’t know that because you don’t have a calibrated monitor and you never print.
A phone makes it easy to take pictures of static objects in low light. Easier, better. The earth is flat, sorry.
Do you mean me, Steve Anderson? If that’s the case, I haven’t discussed image types, quality metrics, or even metrics.
Only if so, Ephemerides.
Easier can be better. But
You’re talking about adding parts to a phone that make it difficult, if not impossible, to put in your pocket.
Let the phone be what it is. A quick snapshot/memory author in your pocket.
It’s horrible for others.
Well, horrible for all things photography (even if the video is very impressive for what it is). . . but the complete opposite of horrible for all the other things it does.
Steve. Non. Ne ask to carry anything. The 3 things I countered already come with the phone. Simple.
DJSTU, If we wanted to go off topic, I’d say smartphones are horrible phones too.
Slippery and difficult to hold in the ear, it picks up sounds from the outside as well or better than our voice coming from the microphone. Yes, there are headphones and Bluetooth, but now you’ve got something in your ears. .
That’s why, in addition to convenience, they’re also concerned about being a phone.
I don’t use it for anything else because it’s useless. I’ve never been stuck without knowing anything critical. Phone/SMS/International Messaging & Camera.
S10 making it a smart device as far as possible.
Ephemeris, anyone who claims that their phone is better than their a7III/R5 wonders why they think that. We use ILC because of the laughable quality and symbol of ILC. The phones are not remotely comparable in those spaces and the other people at ILC. Not all smartphone devices need to be built-in to the cameras.
The masses will have to not spoil the CIT. De any way, the masses will leave when the next attractive event happens.
Feel free to disagree, but keep the verbal exchange respectful.
I’ve run out of space, but I have to say that smartphones are amazing devices overall, but they fail a lot compared to their counterparts other than the ones you have in your pocket.
Great PC but home PC with a much larger screen, mouse, and key.
Good camera, but nowhere near as good as an ILC in terms of ergonomics, lenses, and quality.
etc. . . such as phone, games, TV.
Amazing all-in-one in your pocket. The amazing for private use.
In my view, it takes all the social media nonsense out of the equation. It has a calendar and a calendar with reminders that are better than any other device I’ve ever had, I can handle both work and private emails. It’s safer for bills than any bank card and is less likely to get lost. It has a flexible and up-to-date satellite navigation formula, which is also better than any committed satellite navigation formula you’ve ever seen. I can use Use It for airline and exercise tickets that stay seamlessly on your lock screen when traveling. I can have all my discount/membership cards there. Apps dedicated to grocery shopping are very useful and allow for even more convenience and discounts. It’s an alarm clock calling. It is waterproof. I can check the weather, tide times, follow the sun and moon, arrange photo shoots to paint around the golden and blue hours. I can make shopping lists of foods that can be bookmarked.
All this without taking into account the fact that you can consume media/books/news/sports and pay attention to music.
We hear other people bemoan the fact that they are “taking control of other people’s lives. “Living in general is in one place.
These are amazing teams as we mentioned.
I prefer to do all of this with a few cards in my back pocket. I also make a lot of them, like you, but I prefer to do it without a phone.
Like I said, I’ve never done worse than if I used the phone. If the phone could make my life bigger and less difficult in a positive way, I would. I’m not opposed to it, I just don’t prefer it.
There are also counterarguments to many of those useful tools. It’s worth our time. We are debating the facts, we are just expressing our preferences.
The one thing that governs us all is where I can place some arguments. One thing in our pocket doesn’t do everything.
“As for the electronic viewfinders placed in front of your eyes, how about the Google card?50 pence for two electronic viewfinders. “
mdr You can’t be serious. . . Google stopped it and most people abandoned it for a reason, and most phones still don’t have a variable aperture. I am sorry. . . As I said in the comment, I love my Pixel 8. However, it has a very narrow lane where it sticks out and won’t be upgrading my other cameras anytime soon.
When a phone can have as giant a sensor in its TV module as it does in its 24mm or UWA camera, and figure out how to make a global shutter cost-effective for mass production, we may see another big step forward in phones. . . . There are very genuine technical limitations to achieving both.
Like I said, I love shooting with my phone, but the fake DoF effects aren’t convincing yet, the computer tricks fall apart with moving subjects, and the edges of the TV and UWA don’t compare to the main module. . . And it’s one of the most productive phones out there.
@eno2 “Better DR, tonal curve, bigger colors. A symbol that just looks pleasing to the eye with no extra effort if you don’t want it. “
That’s fine with me. After thinking about it, I agree that a camera of this price diversity has higher symbol processing for JPEG output IF users need it, but it’s not just for Panasonic. The technical DR is, of course, MUCH higher on a full-frame sensor than on a phone, but you’re referring to a “visible” DR and a symbol that looks full and rich in tonal gradations on the screen.
But we’re getting there. Fujimovie is pretty good with its built-in processing and ability to tweak those movie simulations endlessly. With Canon, you can download the Picture Style Editor and create your own look and curves.
The S5 II series supports in-camera LUTs so you can make your JPEG files look great based on your tastes.
Steve. Je did not mention a major, nor a measure of major. Simply, phones have an adjustable aperture, screens similar to the viewfinder but larger. I also said that it’s probably more productive to check out camera features that a phone doesn’t have, or that it’s obviously awesome or some other new attribute. I’m a Canon R5 shooter but I enjoyed reading the article. .
I’m serious, phones have one screen, some have several. I’m serious, you can bring them closer to your eyes if you want. Maybe Samsung’s GearVR.
The thing is, a camera has a display screen (usually), like a phone.
These are the interesting or key themes of this camera.
@couleurs Vivid
My comment wasn’t directed at the S5II or Panasonic. In fact, off-camera JPG files look larger than what my Sony A7III is capable of doing without post-processing.
“It’s fair. After some thought, I agree that a camera with this diversity of value deserves to have more symbol processing for JPEG output IF users need it, but it’s not just for Panasonic. “Ding ding ding!! My old Samsung S8 produces better *OOC* pictures than any camera on the market, in terms of exposure, white balance, and in-camera processing. I’m talking about snapshots that can be easily shared, either online or in person. Of course, they don’t conform to the maximum quality of the symbols on my FF cameras, but those symbols almost require changes before I share them with others. It turns out that the PO point has been ignored, a challenge not unusual here.
@Eric Hensel: That’s right! I think camera brands are still counting on the fact that the maximum number of users will continue their photos by mail, especially files of high-level coaches. In a way, I still need to stay and even edit private snaps and street photographs in RAW. Which, if you think about it, shouldn’t be mandatory at all.
I have some very old Canon cameras lying around (the original 6D and 7D, for example) and interestingly enough, those files are much larger from the start compared to my modern cameras like R6 and R8. In my opinion, at least. They seem almost in one position when I load them into Lighroom while my R8 files want more love before they open up.
So, yes, if camera manufacturers could just work more on their color profiles and curves and some smart AI exposure adjustments, and just put Instagram filters in the files. Yes, I think the need for RAW editing will be minimal in the future.
I also agree with the latest posts here. I understood that the PO’s point of view is that the phone’s camera is just better, period. a7III I can’t stay awake, I value anything.
So I stuck with it.
The phone’s camera is dazzling and makes it undeniable to get 25mm snapshots. Amazing in the dark.
But it’s just a quality that can be shared instantly.
If you are in a position to install your R5/a7III/etc. . . Okay, great.
Don’t try to turn my ILC into a smartphone camera, even if it provides what you think I want. Horrible software has created a mess.
There’s no genuine line, so we have other places where the line is. Of course, for me, I need the AF tracking capability of some mirrorless cameras on DSLRs. But I don’t need lenses that are optically terrible and then software-corrected because other people complain about the weight.
Manufacturers will give us the lowest price to produce. Which will be a software solution. LCD TVs are an example of this. A horrible generation stepped up but was never smart with software tricks.
I took it with my phone and posted it on the Flickr exploration page. I have to admit that if you look at it with pixel perfect, it falls pretty quickly, you can still make out the other two little people walking on the beach, which is pretty impressive.
https://flickr. com/photos/138087015@N02/50922718198/in/datetaken-public/
Fun fact, it’s where the opening scene of Alien 2 is located.
DJ, nothing with this photo. The D850 would be better, but we know. And that’s precisely what camera phones work well with. They don’t do street portraits or moving objects, etc. You already know that.
They can’t do much without a lot of software tricks. To what extent is this photo a software filler from other images or bicubic guesses?
Photographs taken with video rendering technology.
Was it as much fun as if it was with your ILC? It’s okay if it was, but for me still.
I hate holding the phone and breaking a fake button or yelling “shoot!”by phone. It’s an attractive trick but not fun.
I just think we separated a lot of the technology. I don’t need ILC to become a phone because of the masses.
Where are the barriers between enhancement and an Easy for Simple button?
Hmmm, the most recent vote shows that 50% of the people here need software to do everything.
Pills and software versus training and hardware. We like the simple button.
Thanks for the photos, they bring back some memories.
Noise is well controlled in the camera’s JPEG files at maximum ISO (8,000 to 12,800). I’m sure a crude solution would produce even better results.
I would have liked more portraits, in other conditions.
I’m not sure. The RAW processing here is very noisy!Compare the two versions of the two women in front of a store at night. Off-camera, at 3200, it’s pretty clean. The processed RAW is a noisy mess. I think if it was dealt with in something like Photolab 6, it would be a completely different story.
Possible. I use DxO PL as a reference.
Most cameras show visual noise when shadows are lifted in photographs taken at night at ISO 3200.
I didn’t apply any additional noise relief to the photo because we restricted our processing in the camera galleries to fundamental global settings, such as exposure variables and white balance. However, I simply tried applying AI noise relief in Adobe Camera Raw, and this photo is incredibly well clean. I’m guessing you’d see effects with DxO.
もう帰りた〜い
As we conclude our review of the Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 II, we added it to our studio check scene so you can see how it performs.
Lumix full-frame compact cameras get a new feature with the latest firmware update.
New firmware updates for Nikon Z9 and Z8, Fujifilm X-S20, fixes for X100V and Ricoh GR III, GR IIIx and Adobe Camera Raw.
If you want to get a little more video juice out of your mirrorless camera, Panasonic’s S5 II X takes the S5 II up a notch. But can you take high-quality pictures? Look at those samples and for yourself.
The Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 II is a rugged, mid-range, full-frame mirrorless camera that features on-sensor phase detection, 6K open-door video, photo mode LUT, and more. We put the camera to the test in a hand-in checking driving in the real world.
The newest Lumix packs a Four Thirds sensor into a full-frame frame with advanced autofocus and a host of stills and videos to create a Micro Four Thirds camera like a Swiss Army knife.
The fourth camera in Leica’s SL series of full-frame mirrorless cameras sees the 60MP BSI sensor from the Q3 and M11 models with a redesigned interface.
The Fujifilm X100VI is the sixth version of Fujifilm’s classic-style large sensor compact. Among the upgrades are a 40MP X-Trans sensor, built-in stabilization, and 6. 2K video.
The Nikon Zf is a 24MP full-frame mirrorless camera with a vintage look that brings innovations to mid-priced Nikon cameras. We just filmed a sample to get a better idea of its video features and added our impressions to the review.
This $250 electronic lens adapter is ideal for curious Sony Nikon Z-mount photographers; Shhh, we probably wouldn’t tell anyone.
What’s the maximum productivity camera for about $2,000?This price point gives you access to some of the most flexible cameras available. Excellent image quality, rugged autofocus and very good video is the least you can expect. We have chosen the models that stand out.
What is the most productive camera for ing?Good cameras deserve to be small, versatile, and offer smart symbol quality. In this buying guide, we bring together several wonderful cameras and advise the most productive ones.
If you’re looking for a compact camera that produces high-quality images without having to replace lenses, there are plenty of possible options to suit all budgets. Read on to find out which portable compact cars for enthusiasts are our favorites. .
“What is mirrorless camera?” We’re glad you asked.
Cameras over $2,500 tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to choose the “most productive” option. We take a look at features that cost more than $2,500 but less than $4,000, to find the most productive end-to-end solution.
Nikon has announced the Nikkor Z 28-400mm F4-8 VR, a 14. 2x zoom superzoom lens for Z-mount mirrorless cameras.
Sigma has announced the 50mm F1. 2 DG DN Art, a $1,500 overall giant aperture prime lens for the Sony E and Leica L mounts.
Fujifilm US cancelled a large number of orders for the X100VI Limited Edition last week, leading to “suspicious” main points in orders. Buyers will have a momentary chance to get one through a lottery. We will update this article with data on the U. S. and other markets as it becomes available.
The newest Lumix packs a Four Thirds sensor into a full-frame frame with advanced autofocus and a host of stills and videos to create a Micro Four Thirds camera like a Swiss Army knife.
The Japanese concept of Kaizen is used to describe firmware updates, but there’s a better example in front of our eyes.
Astronomy expert and photographer Dr. Tyler Nordgren believes you “see your first eclipse, photograph the second. “But if you’re thinking about taking pictures, here are some tips from someone who’s been there.
Would you pay more to back up your phone’s images to a microSD card than to the cloud?
The Tiffen 58mm iPhone Smartphone Filter Holder uses Apple’s MagSafe formula to temporarily place filters on your iPhone 14 or 15.
Leica has announced that it will make two hundred black-anodized versions of its M-Summilux 35mm F1. 4, a ’60s style reintroduced in 2022, priced at US$10,495.
Instant cameras continue to gain popularity. It’s not just FujiFilm’s Instax diversity to choose from, with offerings from Kodak, Leica, Lomography, Canon, Polaroid and a few indie projects joining the fray. With values ranging from $50 to several hundred dollars, it can be tricky to choose one, but don’t worry, we’ve looked at which ones are worth the buy-in.
We are completing our review of the Panasonic S5II and S5IIX cameras. So when we went to Japan last month to attend the CP Camera Show, we took the S5IIX with us for additional testing. Check out our pattern gallery and tune in to our review. in the coming weeks.
Since its launch in January, users have complained about a bug in the Samsung S24 Ultra’s camera. In a recent post on its network forum, Samsung mentioned the bug and noted that the company is looking for a fix.
77Artisans’ first autofocus lens, a 50mm F1. 8 for Sony’s full-frame E-mount bodies, is now available. From a technical point of view, this “nifty fifty” offers a steel chassis, an STM lens motor and an aperture ring. and for all of Sony’s autofocus features.
Following the launch of the X100 VI, we spoke to Fujifilm’s Yuji Igarashi and Jun Watanabe about the importance of the series, how they balance stills and video, and what’s next.
Today, Logitech announced Mevo Core, a 4K-capable streaming camera built around a Micro Four Thirds sensor and lens mount.
We continued to complete the final revision of Sony’s a9 III, accumulating a few frames along the way. Find out how Sony’s newest sports shooter with sporty subjects and still lifes is faring in our newest pattern gallery.
We’re almost a quarter of the way there this year!Here’s a roundup of the reviews and tests done this year so far, and there will be more (and growing) as the year progresses!
With approximately 20 edits made on a now-infamous photo altered by the British royal family, it’s a reminder of how simple and normalized incorrect information can be if we don’t report it and maintain the lack of truth in photographs.
As a component of our ongoing review, we added the Panasonic G9 II to our studio test scene. This allows you to compare its functionality and download Raw files.
What is the maximum productivity camera for about $2000?This price point gives you access to some of the most flexible cameras available. The least you can expect is excellent symbol quality, rugged autofocus, and wonderful video. We have decided on the models that stand out.
Firmware v5. 0 for the Nikon Z9 improves automatic capture, adds Rich Tone Portrait color mode, as well as a number of feature changes and improvements throughout the camera.
Nikon has updated its SnapBridge remote control and symbol motion app, adding an “easy shooting setup” for entry-level and mid-level cameras, from the Z30 to the Zf.
An eBay user indexed the limited-edition Fujifilm X100VI camera for a whopping $18,000. While this specific directory has since disappeared, others sell for more than $4,000.
The Sony World Photography Awards have announced the winners of the Open 2024 festival categories, adding portraiture, landscape, travel, street photography, lifestyle and more. Take a look at the winning images to see what caught the judges’ attention this year.
At their core, Sony’s a7R V and Leica’s SL 3 share one staple: a 60MP BSI CMOS sensor. But almost everything that overlaps on this basis diverges in radically other directions. Since the SL3 was discontinued this week, we need to take a closer look at this pair.
It’s Oscar weekend, so host another DPReview film festival that celebrates our favorite star: photography!
Panasonic’s newest zoom lens, the Lumix S 28-200mm F4-7. 1 Macro OIS, covers a popular array of diversity, so we took it on vacation to Japan as our only lens. From snow monkeys near Nagano to nightlife scenes in Yokohama, revel in the functionality of this compact zoom.
Lensrentals will get secure assets from BorrowLenses, which will especially expand the company’s stock of camera bodies, lenses, and rental accessories. The “Keeper” market for used Lensrentals devices will also grow substantially. Renters will also get advantages of a new location (the San Francisco domain) to pick up their appliance in person.
Nikon has announced the acquisition of US film manufacturer RED Digital Cinema.
The fourth camera in Leica’s SL series of full-frame mirrorless cameras sees the 60MP BSI sensor from the Q3 and M11 models with a redesigned interface.